How It Works
1
Claim Extraction
The engine pulls out quoted passages, the claims it flagged during the reasoning analysis, and factual-looking sentences from your draft.
2
Public Web Search
For each extracted claim, Fracture searches public pages and retrieves page text to compare against your claim.
3
Match Scoring
The retrieved pages are compared against your claim and assigned a support status based on how closely the page’s content matches.
4
Citation Building
For well-matched claims, Fracture builds a starter MLA or APA entry from the matched page’s details. Your citation format preference is set in Settings.
Support Statuses
How to Read Results Well
- Treat “likely supported” as “worth opening,” not “verified” — a high match score means the page discusses the same subject in similar terms, not that your specific claim has been proven.
- For any load-bearing claim, open the source and read the passage yourself — do not rely on the match status alone when the claim carries real weight in your argument.
- Prefer primary sources, official data, and reputable publications over aggregators and secondary summaries.
- If a claim is flagged “citation incomplete” or “vague,” name the source precisely in your draft and re-run the check — the engine needs enough specificity to find the right page.
What a Match Does and Does Not Mean
- A match means the page discusses the same subject in similar terms — not that it proves your specific claim or supports the exact conclusion you attached to it.
- A match does not confirm the page is accurate or authoritative — a reputable-looking result can still be wrong or outdated.
- A match does not check the methodology or credibility of a study the engine finds — evaluating the quality of the source is your responsibility.